


Someone said that someone they know worked for an asbestos removal team. That it was really dangerous work. Finally law makers passed legislation that...
Someone said that someone they know worked for an asbestos removal team. That it was really dangerous work. Finally law makers passed legislation that people had to stop tearing them down because it was a greater health risk to the workers and people living in the immediate area to tear the building down , due to it is old, it breaks, and not in one piece, than it is to just leave them standing. All it takes is the smallest piece of asbestos in your lungs for you to develop serious lung and other illnesses.
What do you think, could they evacuate the buildings? I see people living in brand new buildings all the time that says "This building is known to the state of California to cause cancer" So the problems are that they are building more buildings with toxins, and/ or leaving dangerous buildings just standing, giving off fumes and maybe not evacuating them. Something seems wrong? What do you think?
Not just apartment buildings but, these signs are also in grocery stores, auto repair shops, the parking structures under malls and hospitals.
Tags: apartment buildings, asbestos removal, auto repair shops, cancer, dangerous buildings, dangerous work, grocery stores, health risk, hospitals, illnesses, legislation, lungs, malls, new buildings, signs, state of california, toxins
Posted in Asbestos Cancer | 3 Comments »
Someone said that someone they know worked for an asbestos removal team. That it was really dangerous work. Finally law makers passed legislation that people had to stop tearing them down because it was a greater health risk to the workers and people living in the immediate area to tear the building down , due to it is old, it breaks,a and not in one piece, than it is to just leave them standing. All it takes is the smallest piece of asbestos in your lungs for you to develop serious lung and other illnesses.
What do you think, could they evacuate the buildings? I see people living in brand new buildings all the time that says "This building is known to the state of California to cause cancer" So the problems are that they are building more buildings with toxins, and/ or leaving dangerous buildings just standing, giving off fumes and maybe not evacuating them. Something seems wrong?
Tags: asbestos removal, cancer, dangerous buildings, dangerous work, health risk, illnesses, legislation, lungs, new buildings, state of california, toxins
Posted in Asbestos Cancer | 2 Comments »
Say, if I hrie a fully licensed asbestos abatement contractor to do the removal/clean-up, after they do the job, how certain it is that the asbestos problems will be resolved?
Does anybody has any asbestos removal experience before?
0 seconds ago - 4 days left to answer.
There is a BROKEN transite vent pipe located in the attic. I got the test result says the transite pipe is a ACM, contains 22% asbestos.
Some HVAC contrabors did the installation work in the attic and broke the transite pipe without knowing it's a hazard of asbestos explosures. The broken transite pipe was left without any proper wrapping.
Tags: acm, asbestos abatement contractor, asbestos problems, asbestos removal, job, test result, transite pipe, vent pipe
Posted in Asbestos | 3 Comments »
Someone said that someone they know worked for an asbestos removal team. That it was really dangerous work. Finally law makers passed legislation that people had to stop tearing them down because it was a greater health risk to the workers and people living in the immediate area to tear the building down , due to it is old, it breaks,a and not in one piece, than it is to just leave them standing. All it takes is the smallest piece of asbestos in your lungs for you to develop serious lung and other illnesses.
What do you think, could they evacuate the buildings? I see people living in brand new buildings all the time that says "This building is known to the state of California to cause cancer" So the problems are that they are building more buildings with toxins, and/ or leaving dangerous buildings just standing, giving off fumes and maybe not evacuating them. Something seems wrong?
Tags: asbestos removal, cancer, dangerous buildings, dangerous work, health risk, illnesses, legislation, lungs, new buildings, state of california, toxins
Posted in Asbestos Cancer | 3 Comments »
Hi all. I'm looking to buy a house that is about 70 years old. It has a finished basement, and one of the pipes from the radiator system is wrapped in asbestos insulation. In general, it seems to be in good condition; however, there is one spot (a few inches wide) that has been cut or is frayed. From everything I've read, asbestos is generally more dangerous if it's removed as it can make airborne the fibers which can then be inhaled and cause cancer in 5-30 years. However, I'm not sure (1) if this is dangerous (2) if the current home owners have been living in a dangerous situation (3) if it makes sense to invest in this house without doing any asbestos removal or, at the least, repair. I spoke with a few companies today, and got an estimate of 1000-1500 for removal of the asbestos.
Is this dangerous?
Is there a way to work "dealing" with the asbestos in the contract?
Am crazy for considering this place?
Am I crazy for thinking the asbestos on the pipe is this serious?
Help!
I am in the state of Missouri. I called around and got several bids for removing about 60 ft of pipe. All were around 1000-1500. I think the actual length of the asbestos pipe is more like 30 ft.
Tags: asbestos insulation, asbestos pipe, asbestos removal, cause cancer, dangerous situation, fibers, finished basement, pipes, radiator, radiator system, state of missouri
Posted in Asbestos Cancer | 5 Comments »
Someone said that someone they know worked for an asbestos removal team. That it was really dangerous work. Finally law makers passed legislation that people had to stop tearing them down because it was a greater health risk to the workers and people living in the immediate area to tear the building down , due to it is old, it breaks, and not in one piece, than it is to just leave them standing. All it takes is the smallest piece of asbestos in your lungs for you to develop serious lung and other illnesses.
What do you think, could they evacuate the buildings? I see people living in brand new buildings all the time that says "This building is known to the state of California to cause cancer" So the problems are that they are building more buildings with toxins, and/ or leaving dangerous buildings just standing, giving off fumes and maybe not evacuating them. Something seems wrong? What do you think?
Not just apartment buildings but, these signs are also in grocery stores, auto repair shops, the parking structures under malls and hospitals.
Tags: apartment buildings, asbestos removal, auto repair shops, cancer, dangerous buildings, dangerous work, grocery stores, health risk, hospitals, illnesses, legislation, lungs, malls, new buildings, signs, state of california, toxins
Posted in Asbestos Cancer | 4 Comments »
Say, if I hrie a fully licensed asbestos abatement contractor to do the removal/clean-up, after they do the job, how certain it is that the asbestos problems will be resolved?
Does anybody has any asbestos removal experience before?
There is a BROKEN transite vent pipe located in the attic. I got the test result says the transite pipe is a ACM, contains 22% asbestos.
Some HVAC contrabors did the installation work in the attic and broke the transite pipe without knowing it's a hazard of asbestos explosures. The broken transite pipe was left without any proper wrapping.
Tags: acm, asbestos abatement contractor, asbestos problems, asbestos removal, job, test result, transite pipe, vent pipe
Posted in Asbestos | 6 Comments »